Myélite postérieure étendue isolée à Aspergillus fumigatus chez un patient sans immunodépression connue

Introduction Les aspergilloses invasives du système nerveux central se présentent majoritairement sous forme d'abcès cérébraux chez des patients immunodéprimés. Nous rapportons ici le premier cas de myélite aspergillaire chez un immunocompétent. Observation Un homme de 45 ans sans immunodépression connue a présenté successivement une infection bénigne par le SARS-CoV-2 puis un épisode respiratoire fébrile intense non documenté résolutif spontanément. Huit semaines plus tard, il présente une panmyélite des cordons postérieurs révélée par une paraparésie spastique d'apparition subaiguë (Fig. 1). Au décours, ascension du niveau médullaire à C4, et évolution vers une tétraplégie flasque sur polyradiculite associée, ayant nécessité la ventilation mécanique. Les multiples explorations infectieuses sanguines et du liquide céphalorachidien, ainsi que les bilans métaboliques, inflammatoires, tumoraux et paranéoplasiques sont restés négatifs. Plusieurs traitements anti-infectieux et immunomodulateurs n'ont pas permis d'amélioration. À trois semaines du début des symptômes, apparition d'une méningite purulente puis d'un nodule paraspinal. La biopsie du nodule a révélé des filaments fongiques au sein d'un tissu nerveux nécrotique, et une PCR positive à Aspergillus fumigatus. Un traitement par amphotéricine-B liposomale et voriconazole, a permis une amélioration clinico-radiologique, permettant la déventilation et récupération de la motricité des membres supérieurs. L'analyse métagénomique des gènes impliqués dans les déficits de l'immunité innée n'a pas révélé de cause à l'immunodépression. Discussion Les aspergilloses invasives du système nerveux central sont extrêmement rares chez les sujets apparemment immunocompétents. Une porte d'entrée pulmonaire peut ici être évoquée devant le tableau respiratoire fébrile initial. Le seul facteur de risque identifié était une exposition professionnelle à des spores aspergillaires (patient paysagiste). C'est à ce jour le premier cas de myélite aspergillaire isolée rapporté dans la littérature. Conclusion Les myélites fongiques, très difficiles à diagnostiquer, doivent être évoquées sur des tableaux graves ne répondant pas aux traitements conventionnels. Une cause d'immunodépression doit être rigoureusement recherchée.

Setting up of a hospital Covid‐19 vaccination center: A descriptive study

Background and Aims The coronavirus pandemic challenged countries worldwide in a race against contaminations and variants. Vaccination campaigns were the answer to such an infectious spread. This descriptive study presents the organizational process of the setting up of a Covid‐19 vaccination center in a French University Hospital in January 2021, the issues encountered along the way and assessment of adaptability. Methods Three major stakeholders: SARS CoV‐2 crisis referent, referring vaccination medical doctor and referring vaccination pharmacist retraced key moments and identified issues encountered during the setting up of the vaccination center and its long term maintenance, threw a series of meetings. Records of crisis and periodic meetings that took place threw out the vaccination campaign were consulted. Results A multidisciplinary crisis steering committee with nine different professionals was created January 3. Logistics for the vaccination center opening were discussed: location, informatics, appointment‐scheduling, pharmaceutical circuit, internal circuit, human resources, and information communication. The vaccination center was ready to welcome healthcare workers in less than 24 h on January 4. The first month, 2757 1st shots were administered, leading up to a total of 9167 1st shots during 6 months of activity. From January to June 2021, the multidisciplinary group dealt and adapted its processes to challenging and unexpected situations. Indeed, issues encountered with Pfizer BioNTech's and AstraZeneca's vaccine, were: supply shortages, vaccine manipulation, targeted populations, pharmacovigilance, and general communication. Conclusion This descriptive study provides an exclusive insight on how a hospital vaccination center was organized and adapted during Covid‐19 pandemic to ensure healthcare workers' security and resilience, and to protect high risk patients of severe Covid‐19 infection.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld) for COVID-19 among 1112 severely immunocompromised patients.

OBJECTIVE: Immunocompromised patients have an increased risk of a severe form of COVID-19. The clinical efficacy of the tixagevimab/cilgavimab monoclonal antibody combination as pre-exposure prophylaxis against BA.1 and BA.2 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sublineages is unknown. We aimed to describe the incidence and outcomes of COVID-19 among immunocompromised patients receiving tixagevimab/cilgavimab as preexposure prophylaxis during the Omicron wave in France. METHODS: This was an observational multicentre cohort study of immunocompromised patients receiving tixagevimab/cilgavimab as preexposure prophylaxis between December 28, 2021 and March 31, 2022. Patients received tixagevimab/cilgavimab 150/150 mg intramuscularly if they had impaired vaccine response and a high risk of severe form of COVID-19. RESULTS: Tixagevimab/cilgavimab was administered to 1112 immunocompromised patients. After a median (range) follow-up of 63 (49-73) days, COVID-19 was confirmed in 49/1112 (4.4%) ≥5 days after treatment. During the study period, mean weekly incidence rate was 1669 in 100 000 inhabitants in Ile-de-France and 530 in 100 000 among patients who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab prophylaxis. Among infected patients, 43/49 (88%) had a mild-to-moderate form and 6/49 (12%) had a moderate-to-severe form of COVID-19. Patients with moderate-to-severe illnesses were less likely to have received early therapies than patients with mild forms (53.5% vs. 16.7% respectively) and 2/49 (4%) patients died from COVID-19. DISCUSSION: Our study reported a low rate of infections and severe illnesses among immunocompromised patients treated with tixagevimab/cilgavimab. A global preventive strategy including vaccines, preexposure prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies, and early therapies might be effective to prevent severe forms of COVID-19 among severely immunocompromised patients.

Case Report: Immune Checkpoint Blockade Plus Interferon-Γ Add-On Antifungal Therapy in the Treatment of Refractory Covid-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis and Cerebral Mucormycosis.

Invasive fungal diseases (IFD) still cause substantial morbidity and mortality, and new therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. Recent data suggest a benefit of checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We report the case of a diabetic patient with refractory IFD following a SARSCoV-2 infection treated by ICI and interferon-gamma associated with antifungal treatment.

COVID-19 outbreak in vaccinated patients from a haemodialysis unit: antibody titres as a marker of protection from infection.

BACKGROUND: Patients on maintenance haemodialysis (HD) have an increased risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and a reduced response to vaccines. Data are needed to identify immune correlates of protection in this population. METHODS: Following a COVID-19 outbreak among vaccinated patients in a HD unit, clinical data and serological response to BNT162b2 vaccine were retrospectively recorded. RESULTS: Among 53 patients present in the dialysis room, 14 were infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) alpha variant (COVID_Pos) and 39 were not. Compared with uninfected patients, COVID_Pos patients more frequently had additional causes of immunosuppression (50% versus 21%; P = .046) and were more often scheduled on the Monday-Wednesday-Friday (MWF) shift (86% versus 39%; P = .002). Moreover, COVID_Pos had lower anti-spike (S) immunoglobulin G (IgG) titres than uninfected patients {median 24 BAU/mL [interquartile range (IQR) 3-1163] versus 435 [99-2555]; P = .001} and lower neutralization titres [median 108 (IQR 17-224) versus 2483 (481-43 908); P = .007]. Anti-S and neutralization antibody titres are correlated (r = 0.92, P < .001). In multivariable analysis, an MWF schedule {odds ratio [OR] 10.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-93.5], P = .014} and anti-S IgG titres 1 month before the outbreak [<205 BAU/mL: OR 0.046 (95% CI 0.002-0.29), P = .006] were independently associated with COVID-19 infection. None of the patients with anti-S IgG >284 BAU/mL got infected. Ten of 14 COVID_Pos patients were treated with casirivimab and imdevimab. No patient developed severe disease. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-S IgG titre measured prior to exposure correlates to protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection in HD patients. BNT162b2 vaccination alone or in combination with monoclonal antibodies prevented severe COVID-19.

Severe relapse of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a kidney transplant recipient with negative nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR after rituximab.

Immunocompromised patients may experience prolonged viral shedding after their initial SARS-CoV-2 infection, however, symptomatic relapses after remission currently remain rare. We herein describe a severe COVID-19 relapse case of a kidney transplant recipient (KTR) following rituximab therapy, 3 months after a moderate COVID-19 infection, despite viral clearance after recovery of the first episode. During the clinical relapse, the diagnosis was established on a broncho-alveolar lavage specimen (BAL) by RT-PCR. The infectivity of the BAL sample was confirmed on a cell culture assay. Whole genome sequencing confirmed the presence of an identical stain (Clade 20A). However, it had an acquired G142D mutation and a larger deletion of 3-amino-acids at position 143-145. These mutations located within the N-terminal domain are suggested to play a role in viral entry. The diagnosis of a COVID-19 relapse should be considered in the setting of unexplained persistent fever and/or respiratory symptoms in KTRs (especially for those after rituximab therapy), even in patients with previous negative naso-pharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR.

Coronavirus Disease 2019-Associated Mucormycosis in France: A Rare but Deadly Complication.

We studied COVID-19 associated mucormycosis based on 17 cases reported nationwide and assessed the differences with India. They differed by frequencies of diabetes mellitus (47% in France versus up to 95% in India), hematological malignancies (35% versus 1%), anatomical sites (12% versus >80% rhino-orbito-cerebral) and prognosis (88% mortality versus <50%).

Weak antibody response to three doses of mRNA vaccine in kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept.

Poor responses to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine have been reported after 2 vaccine injections in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) treated with belatacept. We analyzed the humoral response in belatacept-treated KTRs without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection who received three injections of BNT162b2-mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. We also investigated vaccine immunogenicity in belatacept-treated KTRs with prior COVID-19 and characterized symptomatic COVID-19 infections after the vaccine in belatacept-treated KTRs. Among the 62 belatacept-treated KTRs (36 [58%] males), the median age (63.5 years IQR [51-72]), without COVID-19 history, only four patients (6.4%) developed anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG with low antibody titers (median 209, IQR [20-409] AU/ml). 71% were treated with mycophenolic acid and 100% with steroids in association with belatacept. In contrast, in all the 5 KTRs with prior COVID-19 history, mRNA vaccine induced a strong antibody response with high antibody titers (median 10 769 AU/ml, IQR [6410-20 069]) after two injections. Seroprevalence after three-vaccine doses in 35 non-belatacept-treated KTRs was 37.1%. Twelve KTRs developed symptomatic COVID-19 after vaccination, including severe forms (50% of mortality). Breakthrough COVID-19 occurred in 5% of fully vaccinated patients. Administration of a third dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine did not improve immunogenicity in KTRs treated with belatacept without prior COVID-19. Other strategies aiming to improve patient protection are needed.

Transmission Routes of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Among Healthcare Workers of a French University Hospital in Paris, France.

In this case-control study on 564 healthcare workers of a university hospital in Paris (France), contacts without protection with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients or with colleagues were associated with infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, whereas working in a COVID-dedicated unit and having children kept in childcare facilities were not.